What we are seeing already from police and the Integrated Security
Unit (ISU) as the G20 meetings in Toronto draw closer, is the widespread
manipulation of public sentiment to the effect that protesters are ‘dangerous’,
‘criminal’, and hell-bent on violence and destruction -- the fabrication of a
pre-justification for the deployment of future violence by the state.
Effectively using terror to trounce our right to democratic
protest and free speech, members of the ISU, in connection with CSIS agents,
have repeatedly harassed non-violent activists in a manner more commonly seen
in countries with a secret police, public denunciations, and disappearances.
The police have publicly advertised the purchase of new weapons to use against protesters, including an LRAD system, new riot gear, and hundreds of new
cameras; they have paraded in front of the media in a massively-aggressive show
of force; and they have leaked internal communications requesting the services
of area doctors and the existence of a converted factory lot that will serve as
a makeshift concentration camp for arrested demonstrators. For the police, the
summits represent a massive public windfall of both financial and social
capital with which to purchase new toys and to openly bend the law.
The police are effectively trying to deter less-committed,
less-radical, and first-time activists from ever showing up while
simultaneously antagonizing more radical elements by picking a fight they
already know they can win. The police and the media are happy to go out of
their way to stress how a majority of the 1.2 billion dollars being spent on
security for the summits is clearly not to protect a bunch of VIPs from
terrorists (who may crash their fancy dinner parties), but rather simply to
protect those VIPs from having their precious schmoozing interrupted by
informed and angry citizens wishing to express themselves freely outside of the
meetings.
Even 9 years ago, when the G8 met in Genoa , Italy ,
in 2001, putting large fences around international gatherings to create
"red zones" was all the rage. It was the height of the
anti-globalization movement, pre-9/11, and over 300,000 demonstrators turned
out to democratically voice their grievances.
Predictably, the police also turned out in force, viciously
attacking and injuring more than 400 unarmed civilians (caught in the wrong
place at the wrong time), journalists, and activists with a combination of
chemical weapons and less-lethal projectiles. Mass arrests were not yet common
police practice, but those 300 or so arrested were subject to verbal
intimidation, beatings, and the threat of rape. Genoa also marked the first
recorded death of a protestor at a demonstration in the Western world (since
the movement gained momentum in Seattle in 1999), when Carlo Giuliani was shot
in the head and run-over, twice, by a member of Italy’s military police, the
Carabinieri.